We don’t think of our proposal as a model. A model is a simplified representation or example of reality. All of our work has been an attempt to directly match the proposed area of Baja California to the Book of Mormon account. There has never been a need to have a model. A model is a partial representation of reality. Our goal has never been a partial match but a 100 percent match. We like to refer to our proposal as comprehensive—sea to sea, land to land, feature to feature and scale to scale. In other words, the proposed area should match all the possible geographical descriptions and distances outlined in the Book of Mormon not just those that happened within a limited area or time period or fit a certain model. We should be quick to note, however, that individual events and individual time periods of Book of Mormon history happened in specific and very limited areas, such as the battles waged around the hill Riplah and the hill Amnihu. At other times, nearly the entire area was occupied simultaneously. It is like the geography and history of the Bible lands—it happened in limited areas at times and then extended to a much larger geographical region at other times.
Updated: Tuesday, 13 July 2010
Questions Archaeological Evidence Why Baja California Most Important Evidence Limited Geographical Model Wars and Conflicts Analog of Biblical Lands Direction of the River Sidon Other Evidence Translation Insights What led you to Baja California
Comments and Suggestions
Please provide suggestions or comments related to the content of this site. You may optionally provide an email address so that we may contact you if there are further questions.
Send to a Friend
Enter in your friends email and your email and a short message.
Enter in your email address to receive newsletters and notifications.